#128. Richard Ward writes about His Own Recent Paintings

All of these were done in the last couple of months and all in the same way – an old painting covered up with Payne´s grey, new paint applied/scraped with a palette knife, here and there disrupted with a brush.

Although none of them are intentionally one or the other, for me they range from obviously figurative to more or less abstract. For me again, the more spatial they are, the more figurative and the more figurative, the more spatial.

And the more spatial they are, the more engaging too – not because the figuration is in any way interesting (this is what I mean with “bland figuration”) but because the viewer´s projection of virtual space enables (or drags along) a simultaneous projection of subjective feeling, modulated by the surface shapes and colours. The more abstract, less spatial paintings tend to lack that element of “recognition”, not of figures but of some kind of subjective truth. Or that´s my thinking at the moment.

I think that the “presence” of a painting (as discussed in a previous thread by Emyr) is also determined by its spatiality, this time in combination with a strong awareness of surface. The crude psychology that I imagine to lie behind this is that our survival demands a much stronger response to things that move towards us than to things that recede. If a painting allows a to-and-fro between virtual space and material surface then the approach of the surface registers more strongly than the recession into space, leaving us with a semi-conscious impression that the painting is somehow pressing into the space in front of its material self.
On a screen, paintings lose most of their surface and thereby nearly all of their presence.

Resolution in the surface pattern and coherence of the virtual space are both important goals for me. The difference between modernism and postmodernism has been described (David Harvey in “The Condition of Postmodernity”) as modernity´s belief-in plus struggle-to-attain wholeness, truth, maturity, integration etc. in the face of fragmentation and alienation, whereas postmodernity embraces that fragmentation and alienation. In this sense (and maybe in others too) these are old-fashioned paintings.

I absolutely appreciate the arguments against figuration – that it “hijacks” the painting with illustration and narrative, that it places non-visual constraints on the artistic process, that it can tend to confirm rather than question our perceptions. On the other hand, I imagine any “new way” of seeing must include but transcend old ways of seeing in the same way that the physics of relativity includes but transcends Newtonian physics.
As to constraints, that is not my experience at all. The figuration in all of these paintings is discovered rather than worked-towards. Most have been turned several times in the search for an interesting and convincing virtual space. Almost all of the conscious, deliberate, local decisions have been about colour and surface.

Finally, I find that many of the criteria for what is figurative and what is abstract somewhat dogmatic and arbitrary. Just one example: Atmospheric / oceanic space is widely accepted as abstract where to my mind it is about as figurative as it gets (the clue is in the name).
I tend to see abstract painting as a process rather than a result.

 

juni20b 80 x 70 cm

 

juni20c 80 x 70 cm

 

juni20g 40 x 40 cm

 

juni20i 90 x 70 cm

 

juni20n 90 x 70 cm

 

mai20a 80 x 70 cm

 

mai20a 80 x 70 cm

 

mai20h 60 x 60 cm

 

mai20p 120 x 100 cm

 

4 comments

  1. Hi Richard, I have reread your text and am wondering which paintings you think have more ‘figuration’ and are therefore more spacial, and which you feel are more abstract and therefore less so.
    There seem to be some very rich textural passages in these works, which I like, especially Mai20h with its red and grey/blue accents.
    I also enjoy the movement and interrupted light areas in Juni20b, there is a flow to this painting which travels to the edges and back.

    Like

  2. Hi Noela, I hope that these are all at least somewhat spatial. The most obviously figurative ones are juni20n and the second mai20a (wrong name) , which is actually 120×100 cm.
    But juni20b, juni20c, juni20g and juni20i all look figurative to me.
    I think it‘s a two way thing: the figuration creates the space and the space creates the figuration.

    The first mai20a and mai20p both look quite abstract to me but only have that rather familiar shallow space with parallel planes and an atmospheric background through the gaps that keeps you firmly on the outside.

    The painting right at the top would also fall into this category but I think that the stained-glass-window-look can kind of transport you into a church-like space, so yes, more spatial but also more figurative.

    mai20h can have that same „screen on an atmospheric background“ look but is more interesting when the white becomes a tabletop. This reverses the light, which now comes from outside the painting, and creates a „grabbable“ (and figurative) still-life space.

    Incidentally, some of the jpegs are too small for what WordPress wants to do with them on a large screen. If you click on them, they shrink back to their proper size and lose that woolly look.

    Lisa, thank you for the encouraging words.

    Like

    1. I think I am going to go for ‘immaterial abstract space’ that I mentioned in a post in Tim’s last essay, and try and see your paintings in that context.
      I find sometimes when think I can I see a still life the ‘space’ can seem to shrink rather than expand.
      I feel your more ‘abstract’ paintings can convey a ‘fluid spaciality’, (also something Tim mentioned), which is a concept that works for me to a greater extent.
      I probably respond to colour and light more than spaciality though.
      Hope to see them in the flesh one day.
      I have been rewatching some Brancaster films and really getting a lot out of them again.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s